Thursday, 14 June 2012

Death of a Giant- A Fan's Viewpoint

The 12th of June 2012 was the date HMRC stuck the final nail in the coffin of Glasgow Rangers.

Now I won't hide that my footballing allegiances are firmly towards the Ibrox side, but unlike the majority of my fellow supporters I have no complaints over the situation we are in. Bottom line this is our fault. We overspent and withheld our tax for a number of years in order to fund a push for European success. Now that it is coming back to haunt us we have no valid basis to argue that we should stay in the SPL.

While I do believe that it has not been handled well by the powers that be i.e. trying to bring in new rules which directly effect the situation at hand was a disaster waiting to happen. It completely undermined their authority and neutrality in which to govern over the situation. The discussions over the new rules should have been delayed until after the outcome of Rangers woes. It may be a rule change that is needed but the timing left the SPL in a lose-lose position.

By trying to introduce these measures it just gave a platform for the 'experts' to see bias withing the organisation. I put the word experts in quotation marks as all the hotlines and forums around Scotland are filled with people discussing something they know little about. The intricacies of administration and newco's are hard enough to assess for the professionals never mind your average punter down the pub. It's frustrating to hear fans berating those trying to buy the club over the speed of making bids or sending out the Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA). By all means debate why we are in this position, why it has been allowed to get this far but the financial documents are not simple to produce in a short space of time. In essence the SPL were caught between a rock and many hard places and they were never going to be seen to be acting fairly by both sides meaning controversy was always going to ensue. What's clear is Rangers have had to take what is coming and should be trying to hold onto what slight dignity we have left.

I move onto the role Rangers have had to play in their own downfall. It pains me to see the state the club currently is in, and there are a variety of people responsible. Firstly Sir David Murray has to take his share of the blame for the current state of the club. "For every five pounds Celtic spend, we will spend ten". If he could take those ten words back then i'm sure he would. The Dick Advocaat era at Ibrox has given Murray a lot to answer for. While the fans would love to see that spending taking place in every transfer window, a businessman of Murray's stature must surely have seen that spending outwith your means will not end well. Signing Tore Andre Flo for £12 million, £4.5 million for Arthur Numan among a 36 million pound spending spree in his first season was the supposed dawning of a new era. All that it has achieved it pushing the club to the brink of extinction. The level of idiotic spending is personified with the realisation Bert Konterman was being paid £18,000 per week. It baffles me how a man with a net worth of over £100 million could fail to see the flaws of operating at this level. Surely he had to seperate the fan from the businessman and realise a few years of success is not worth the decimation of our great club. All was not rosy in David Murray's garden but his European ambitions meant things would continue to spiral out of control.

Craig Whyte is the next man to feel the frustrations of the Ibrox faithful. A man who came into the club stating his pride at being a 'lifelong supporter', his actions since taking over have certainly not been befitting of  being in the Rangers family. Mercilessly draining the financial assets of the club has resulted in this rapid decline into the forced formation of a new company. Funding his takeover using the fan's season ticket money was a fundamental attempt at deceiving everyone involved, an attempt at which he succeeded, and a blatant misuse of funds which he had gained. A fact that enrages me further is that since his takeover Whyte refused to pay tax, meaning our bill went up and up. While i know we were struggling to make ends meet, surely aggravating our main creditor by refusing to pay what we owe is not a smart business move. It is my belief that Whyte's denial to act in the proper interests of the club and only himself has made this situation even worse. The BBC documentary 'The men who sold the jersey's" just added to my, and everyone else connected with Rangers, anger at the way this man has went about his business. The Employee Benefit Trusts are neither here nor there as the use of these is not illegal, and it would not have surprised me had the tax case regarding these been won by Rangers. However the dismissal of club legend John Greig along with most of the previous board should have been a clear indication all was not well. This entire situation has been a disaster from day one and the SFA's 'stringent' checks applied to new owners must be tightened up as to stop something like this happening again.

Overall we as a club will just have to accept our fate and try to move on with dignity. Division 3 looms but this may be a punishment we just have to take and rebuild. Livingston and Gretna have been forced to start again due to financial misdemeanors and in reality we should be no different. Despite the size and tradition of our club, we have broken the rules, lived without our capabilities and the consequences have to be suffered. I'm sure we can advance through the leagues sufficiently within a few years if we retain a base of players and the club will continue to have its fan base whatever division we are in. I wish it hadn't got to this stage, and this wasn't our only outcome, but it is no longer in our control. We must band together, take our punishment and support our team wherever we end up.

As the club motto states, we will always be 'Ready'.


  1. Finally a rangers fan speaking with his head after deciphering the facts from the tangled web of deceit and skulduggery that has taken place at ibrox
    Throughout this saga. I wish some of your fellow bears would realise it is NOT a Celtic conspiracy to have you removed, it was rangers who done this to rangers! Another point I would like to raise is that we are constantly hearing that 'the club shouldn't be punished for the actions of one man' well I beg to differ, did the club not reap the rewards of 'the actions of one man' as mr Murray embarked on his crazy crusade? Yes the club did and so it shall be that the club shall be punished for 'the actions of one man'.
    As for the sfa imposing illegal sanctions I agree with you to a point, technically the sfa were wrong and rangers were right but I think the sfa were of the mindset that rangers won't have any money to buy any players so the punishment will effectively be null and void!

    Just as a side point I seen some fans were heckling mr green as he left intoxicating after announcing he had control of the club because they want Walters consortium in place, surely heckling the man who put his hand in his pocket when no one else would is not the way forward? Have they learned nothing from bill miller?

  2. Thanks a lot. As hard as it is to not be biased over this issue, we really have to stand up and accept our fate. Got to suffer the consequences.
    Yeah as much as Walter is a club legend, it was too late to be launching a bid. I just hope Green has the ability to make this work and keep us afloat. The treatment of Bill Miller was disgraceful. "Go home you yank" or words to that effect e-mailed to him, i'm not surprised he walked away. This whole situation is something i never wanted to see happen and i can only hope we come out the other side and can rebuild.

  3. It wasn't just emailed to me miller there were several banners unfurled at a match one I which said 'no thanks yank' I know you must be hurting but something I'm confused about, not sure if you know one way or another, if mr green has transferred the assets to 'newco' what exactly would HMRC be liquidizing?

  4. Yeah saw the banner too, hardly productive at a time when we needed saving. Basically the company that was Rangers Football Club has been closed down, and the assets have been moved to a new company 'The Rangers Football Club' i think it is going to be called. Just basically the debt is cleared and the company starts afresh with no debt. To be honest i may be wrong about the no debt part, but to my understanding that is what happens.

  5. Yeah but why would HMRC even bother appointing bdo as liquidisers if there is nothing to liquidise? Makes no sense! Can they seize the assets from green? And I so why would he buy them?

  6. This article on STV will be able to sum it up better than me i think. Hope it helps.

  7. Why shouldn't people with little or no knowledge discuss these matters? Is that not education or is this a matter for alumni only? Or shuld we have relied on the MSM and sporting genius like Jim Traynor and Kieth Jackson for information?

    I agree with much of what you say Graeme and it's refreshing to see a recognition of wrongdoing by Rangers FC from a Rangers FC supporter. However you refer to the club in the present tense. The club is extinct. Charles Green is not the new owner of Rangers FC, he is the owner of the assets of what was formerly Rangers FC and has (or is in the process of) transferring these to a NEW company which is a NEW club.

    I wish the entirely new club, whenever it is established, the best of luck wherever it ends up. But that club will not be Rangers FC founded 1872, incorporated 1899, winner of 54 league titles whatever way you want to look at it.

  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

  9. I think if you read again what i have written, in no way have i said we shouldn't discuss the matter as a whole. It is the frustrating way people with little clue how the financial workings of a club actually take place seem to be 'experts'. By all means if you have relevant knowledge then discuss it till the cows come home, but unless this is the case leave the CVA's to people that have trained and are employed to deal with them. As much as they may not seem competent to an outside view, no-one will when the case is something so close to people's hearts.
    Your right i do refer to the club in the present tense. The club is not dead, the company which ran it is. In essence Rangers is still there, it has just been taken over by a different company. The facilities, staff etc are all still alive and well but the controlling company is now called 'The Rangers Football Club'. While it may look like its a new club starting again, it is clear that it is the same club rebuilding. A new company is not the same as the club going extinct.

  10. When did Rangers die?

    I know the old PLC died but the club died?

    The club never died, poorly worded.

  11. By death I wasn't using as a literal term for the Rangers as a whole. It was used to describe the fact we will no longer be a giant for the foreseeable few years if/when we go down to division 3. No longer will we be aiming for Europe but titles in the lower league